Requirements as to recommendations and previous sanctions to be regarded as matters of procedure only
Quick Summary (TL;DR)
Article 255 (Requirements as to recommendations and previous sanctions to be regarded as matters of procedure only): Governs federal legislative and administrative division of powers between the Union and States under Part XI.
In Simple Citizen Words
Article 255 ('Requirements as to recommendations and previous sanctions to be regarded as matters of procedure only') in Part XI (Relations between the Union and the States) structures Indian federalism. It governs territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction under the Union, State, and Concurrent Lists of the Seventh Schedule, GST concurrent powers (Art 246A), residuary powers (Art 248), inconsistency/repugnancy rules (Art 254), inter-state river water disputes (Art 262), or the Inter-State Council (Art 263). Specifically: No Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of a State and no provision in any such Act, shall be invalid by reason only that some recommendation or previous sanction required by this Constitution was not given, if assent to that Act was...
Key Constitutional Provisions
Constitutional Mandate (Art. 255): Directly codifies the legal rule for 'Requirements as to recommendations and previous sanctions to be regarded as matters of procedure only' under Part XI
Structured across 1 clause(s) and 3 sub-clause(s) with clear procedural conditions
Requires transparent Parliamentary law-making and democratic accountability rather than arbitrary executive action
Exceptions & Reasonable Restrictions
Federalism is part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution (S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994); neither the Union nor the States can usurp the exclusive legislative domain assigned to the other.
Why This Matters in Daily Life
Clarifies which government (Central or State) is responsible and accountable for every law, tax, and public service affecting your life.
Want deeper legal & historical context? Explore the official Bare Act or Supreme Court Precedents & CAD Debates: